Whether these scores reflect conscious "fake good" impression management or religious-based virtuousness remains unanswered.
Our analyses indicated that religious-group membership accounts, on average, for elevations on L of about 5 t-score points. The meta-analysis revealed large between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 87.1), L scale scores for religious samples that were somewhat higher but did not approach the upper limits specified in the MMPI-2 manual, and an overall moderate effect size (d¯ = 0.54, p <. We then conducted a meta-analysis of 12 published MMPI-2 studies in which we compared L scores of religious samples to the test normative group. To assess the validity of the traditional background hypothesis, we reviewed 11 published studies that employed the original MMPI with religious samples and found that only 1 obtained an elevated mean L score.
Mmpi 2 lie scale manual#
At the same time, the current MMPI-2 manual states that "traditional" and religious backgrounds can account for elevated L scale scores as high as 65T-79T, thereby tempering impression management interpretations for faith-based individuals. Conclusiones: Se discute la utilidad para la práctica forense de estos resultados.The Lie (L) scale of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is widely regarded as a measure of conscious attempts to deny common human foibles and to present oneself in an unrealistically positive light. madre) y el contexto de evaluación (progenitores en disputa por la custodia de los hijos vs. Se estudiaron como moderadores el género del progenitor (padre vs. Los tamaños del efecto de las escalas L, K, S y MP, y los índices L + K-F y L + K resultaron ser iguales. Personality Characteristics Associated with MMPI-2 Elevations on Clinical Scales. Psychological Assessment, doi:2015- 55810-001 pii Abstract: The Lie (L) scale of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is widely regarded as a measure of conscious attempts to deny common human foibles and to present oneself in an unrealistically positive light. Para F y el índice F-K fue negativo y significativo, pero no generalizable para F y generalizable para F-K. A measure of rather unsophisticated or self consciously. for Elevated MMPI and MMPI-2 Lie-Scale Scores. Para Wsd, también resultó positivo, significativo y grande, pero no generalizable. Resultados: Los resultados mostraron un tamaño del efecto medio verdadero positivo, significativo, grande y generalizable para las escalas L, K, S y MP, y los índices L + K y L + K-F. Los tamaños del efecto fueron corregidos por error de muestreo y falta de fiabilidad del criterio. Método: Para establecer el estado de la cuestión se llevó a cabo un meta-análisis encontrando 32 estudios primarios de los que se obtuvieron 256 tamaños del efecto. Para esta doble tarea, el instrumento de referencia es el MMPI. Conclusions: The results are discussed in relation to forensic practice.Īntecedentes/Objetivo: En los casos de disputa por la custodia, el psicólogo forense tiene entre sus cometidos la evaluación de las competencias parentales, así como sospechar disimulación. parenting capacity) were assessed as moderators. mother) and the context of evaluation (parent child custody disputes vs.
The effect sizes for the L, K, S and MP scales, and the L + K and L + K-F indexes were equal. A negative and significant, but not generalizable mean true effect size was found for the F and generalizable for F–K index. The Wsd was positive, significant and large, but not generalizable. Results: The results revealed a positive, significant, large and generalizable mean true effect size for the L, K, S and MP scales, and the L + K and L + K-F indexes.
A meta-analysis was undertaken, effect sizes were corrected for sampling error and criterion unreliability. Method: As to establish the state of the art on this, a meta-analysis was undertaken with a total of 32 primary studies from which 256 effect sizes were assessed. The instrument of choice for undertaking this double task is the MMPI. Background/Objective: In child custody disputes, one of the remit of the forensic psychologist is to evaluate parental attributes while suspecting defensiveness.